beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The organization of telephone financing fraud 662 of the 2018 High Order 662 (former Name “Sscam”) takes part in the role of each of the parties, under the name of the account holder, to transfer money to a designated account under the pretext of lending arrangement, etc., by falsely speaking to the effect that the organization, while operating the call center in China, would transfer money to a designated account from a large number of unspecified people in the Republic of Korea at the call center to a designated account under the name of the victims, such as “personnel of the call center,” and loans, etc., to which the victims would receive the account to be used for the phishing crime, to transfer money from the account holder to the designated account, the organization directly withdraws the money by transmitting the money from the account holder, the check card to be used for committing the crime, etc., and directly withdraws the money from the account holder or deliver it to another account.
Accordingly, from January 15, 2018, the Defendant received the number of physical cards to be delivered on the same day through B from the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the column of “B” (B.C.) of the Defendant, and the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name of the Defendant (B.C.) and the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in question (B.) and returned the phone to the relevant name in the name in the name of the business site, and returned the phone to the relevant name in the name in the name of the business site, and signed the signature on the back of the collected physical card, and then sent the phone to D. The “delivery center assistant” to transfer the money secured by the Defendant in the name in the name in the form of lending, etc., and D conspired in order to commit the telephone fraud by withdrawing the money remitted to the victims by using the check card received by
1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall deliver any access medium in return for payment;
Nevertheless, the defendant around February 7, 2018.