logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016.5.12.선고 2016도2791 판결
가.배임증재·나.배임수재
Cases

Do 2016 Do 2791 A. Property in breach of trust

(b) Dried trees;

Defendant

1. A.

2. B

Appellant

Defendant 1

Defense Counsel

Law Firm C (Attorney AP, D, and E (Defendant A)

Attorney BG (Defendant B’s national ship for Defendant B)

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2015No 2320 decided January 29, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

May 12, 2016

Text

all appeals shall be dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are determined.

1. According to the reasoning of the original judgment as to Defendant A’s grounds for appeal, the original judgment is justifiable to determine Defendant A guilty of the facts charged of the instant public prosecution on the grounds of the legal principles as stated in the judgment below and the acknowledgement of facts. There is no error of misapprehending the legal principles as to re-violation of breach of trust, recognition of illegality, and abuse of public prosecution rights.

2. According to the reasoning of the original judgment as to Defendant B’s grounds for appeal, the original judgment is justifiable to determine Defendant B guilty of the facts charged in this case on the grounds of the above legal principles and factual recognition as stated in the judgment. There is no error of misapprehending the legal principles as to the crime of taking property in breach of trust, the recognition of illegality, and the abuse of public prosecution rights.

Furthermore, according to Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in the case of death penalty, life imprisonment, imprisonment with or without prison labor for more than ten years, or imprisonment with or without prison labor, a final appeal against the above defendant for the reason of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, the argument that the above defendant's judgment of punishment is unfair in the instant case sentenced to a more minor punishment cannot be a legitimate ground for final appeal.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Kim Yong-deok

Justices Lee In-bok

Justices Kim So-young

Chief Justice Lee Ki-taik

arrow