beta
Cases
2017do 745(a) interferes with the exercise of ex officio rights
(b) interference with tenders;
Defendant
1. A.
2. B
Appellant
Prosecutor
Defense Counsel
legal entity C.
Attorney in charge D, AG
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul Central District Court Decision 2016 3282 Decided December 15, 2016
Imposition of Judgment
6, 2017.6
Text
all appeals shall be dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are determined.
Based on the reasoning stated in the judgment below, the court below maintained the judgment of the court of first instance that rendered a verdict of not guilty on the charge of this case against Defendant B, deeming that there was no proof of a crime. In light of the record on the reasoning of the original judgment, the above judgment of the court below is justifiable. The court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on obstruction of exercise of rights by official authority or obstruction of bidding, by violating the legal principles on obstruction of exercise of rights by official authority, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Kwon Soon-il
Principal Justice Park Poe-young
Justices Kim Jae-hyung