Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 19, 2017, around 13:23, the Defendant found that there was no correction of the victim E-owned f. F. F. L., the victim E, parked at the front parking lot of the “D real estate” located in O.S., and that the Defendant opened the above door and entered the vehicle into the vehicle and stolen the victim’s property with cash of KRW 40,000,000,000, which is the victim’s possession of the sunlight.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A E-document;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV image data;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Since the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the sentencing guidelines do not apply to the recruitment of the workhouses.

In light of the fact that there has been a history of punishment for the same crime several times, and in particular, it is necessary to punish the crime of this case with strict punishment corresponding thereto in light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed without being aware of the fact that not only the period of suspension of execution for the same crime but also the period of suspension of execution has been punished as a fine for the same crime.

However, in light of the fact that the amount of damage is relatively minor, the amount of damage was repaid and agreed, and the fact that one's mistake is divided, etc., the circumstances favorable to the defendant shall be considered, and the punishment of the fine shall be imposed in consideration of all the sentencing factors indicated in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means, consequence, and circumstances after the crime, etc., and the judgment shall