The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court found the Defendant guilty on the ground that the Defendant did not have inflicted an injury upon the victim by assaulting the victim.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below: ① the victim has consistently maintained in the investigative agency and the court of the court below; ② the victim got out of the toilets of the third floor of the building of this case to the left hand and the right door by the defendant; ② the victim stated that the defendant was faced with the left hand and the right door by the rain strings, regardless of the defendant's right door; ② the victim suffered the right hand hand hand, the string and salt strings, the right hand strings, and the right hand strings (Evidence No. 14 pages) and the victim's photograph (Evidence No. 15 pages); ③ The defendant's friendly appearance E was hard to leep in the 1st floor of the building of this case; ③ The defendant's injury was not accepted in the court of the court below's ruling, and the defendant's statement in the above facts charged in excess of the floor of this case.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition