logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.08.25 2016가합51800
임금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs each amount stated in the "request amount" column for each plaintiff's claim amount by attached Form 2 and it.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a public corporation established by the Incheon International Airport Corporation for the construction project of Incheon International Airport and the management, operation, maintenance, and repair of the Incheon International Airport, and the plaintiffs are employees belonging to the defendant.

B. From 2011 to 2013, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiffs performance evaluation and internal evaluation (hereinafter “instant performance evaluation”) calculated by applying the payment rate based on the payment rate based on the amount of base salary at the end of the previous year pursuant to Articles 15 and 3 [Attachment 3] and 15-2 and [Attachment 3-1] of the Defendant’s Remuneration Regulations (hereinafter “instant remuneration regulations”).

Specific payment details of the instant performance bonus by the Plaintiff are as stated in the attached Table 3’s calculation sheet of the amount to be recovered.

(c) On October 2014, the Board of Audit and Inspection requested the following dispositions, while conducting an audit of the operational status of the Incheon International Government Supply Port:

Although the basic annual salary of a person subject to the annual salary system among the standards for compilation and payment of piece rates under the Guidelines for Compilation of Budget of Public Corporations and Quasi-Governmental Institutions in the year 201 through 2013, which is the Ministry of Strategy and Finance guidelines, is subject to the application of 1/12 of the previous year’s basic annual salary, the defendant shall pay an excessive amount of KRW 404,784,000, such as the payment of piece rates based on the basic monthly salary from the end of the previous year to 2013 in accordance with the defendant’s remuneration regulations amended from 2011 to 2013 (the matters to be subject to measures) [1] ① Measures to recover the total amount of performance rates and internal evaluations paid excessively, unlike the Guidelines for Compilation of Budget of Public Corporations and Quasi-Governmental Institutions; ② Measures to revise Articles 15 and 15-2 of the defendant’s remuneration regulations in compliance with the Guidelines for Compilation of Budget of Public

D. On November 25, 2015, the Defendant calculated the amount to be recovered from the benefits to be paid to the Plaintiffs upon the request of the said Board of Audit and Inspection.

arrow