logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2012.10.24 2012고단1864
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has been working as a street cleaners from April 2007.

1. Around June 23, 2009, the fraud Defendant made a false statement to the above victim E’s home located in Seoul D, stating that “I wish to employ the children of the Party as a street cleaners of the Gu Office because I know that I personally F is about to be employed by the head of the Gu in Korea. Even if a formal test is conducted, I would like to change the amount of KRW 40 million in return for finding employment as if I want to receive an employment.”

However, even if the defendant received the money from the above victim, he did not have the ability or intention to find the above victim's children as a street cleaners of the Gu Office.

From March 10, 2012 to March 10, 2012, the Defendant received a total of KRW 92 million from the above victim and acquired it by defraudation, as indicated in the crime list, from the time of receipt of KRW 35 million in cash from the victim.

At the time of the No. 1 of the crime of crime: (a) the money of KRW 35 million in the name of the target day on June 23, 2009; and (b) the money of KRW 5 million in the employment of the street cleaners employed on September 15, 2009; and (c) the money of KRW 5 million in the employment of the street cleaners employed on January 14, 2010; (d) first, the money of KRW 15 million in the employment of the street cleaners employed on January 22, 2010, first, the money of KRW 2 million in the employment of the street cleaners employed on the street cleaners employed on February 10, 2010, first, the money of KRW 6 million in the employment of the street cleaners on February 10, 2010, first, the money of KRW 7 million in the employment of the street cleaners on June 25, 2010, the money of KRW 200,000 in the name of the Gu office.

2. The Defendant forged private document, who did not find employment from the above victim, prepared a cash custody certificate in the name of C head of C/C F before being urged to receive the demand, and had the intent to keep the said victim’s demand.

around March 8, 2011, the Defendant is in blank without authority for the purpose of exercising the trade name in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, where it is impossible to identify the trade name in Seongdong-gu.

arrow