logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고단5437
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of the C Launa car.

1. On August 25, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.166% alcohol concentration from the 20km section to the front road of the reputation gas charging station located in the Gyeong-gu, Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, via a four-distance road in front of the four-lane-dong in the Daegu-gu, Seo-gu. In short, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 20km alcohol concentration of about 0.16%.

2. Around August 25, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) led the Defendant to drive the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.166% in blood, and drive the said vehicle at a speed of 0.16% in the same manner as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, and drive the vehicle at a speed of 5-lane in front of the four-lane distance in the direction of the horizontal four-lane distance from the horizontal four-lane distance.

The location is a road where a large number of vehicles are in progress, and the condition of the stop signal was included, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the driver of the vehicle by properly operating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it was due to the negligence of neglecting his duty at the front time, and the part behind the EM3 vehicle driven by the victim D (hereinafter, 25 years old) who was waiting in the signal signal at three-lanes in the same direction as the time she was driving, and the part behind the vehicle of the Defendant, the Defendant was able to have the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle. While the above SM3 passenger vehicle was pushed in the future, the above SM3 passenger vehicle was pushed in the front part of the SM3 vehicle, the victim F(n, 54 years old) who was waiting in the signal waiting at the front of the SM3 vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc. in the cirratty that requires approximately three weeks of treatment, and the victim.

arrow