A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with sod motor vehicle B.

1. On August 23, 2009, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.169% from the 4km section to the front road of the State bond compensation park located in Daegu Jung-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, about 02:40 on the same day from the front of the Korean church in the Gu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 02:40 on the same day.

2. The Defendant, who violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., an escapeing vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (i.e., an accident) (ii) drive the said vehicle at around 02:40 on the same day, led the road front of the State bond compensation park to the direction from the fourth four streets on the side of the end.

At that time, the victim C, who was under the stop of the signal waiting at the aftermath, was a DNA observer car driven by the victim C, so in such a case, the defendant engaged in driving service had a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by sending the signal, such as a horn, etc., well-being the rear and right and the right and the right and the right of the defendant.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not check the safety of the course by properly examining the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the part of the observer which the Defendant driven by the Defendant due to the negligence, and received the part of the observer in front of the vehicle driving by the victim.

The Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as catum salt, etc. requiring a treatment for about three weeks, and suffered injury to the victim E who boarded the observer car of the above victim, such as catum salt, etc. requiring a treatment for about three weeks, and at the same time, did not stop immediately after the victim’s observer car and attempted to escape without taking measures such as aiding the damaged person, even though the damage was inflicted on the property equivalent to KRW 367,440, 367,00 for repairing expenses, such as exchange of dats, etc. after the victim’s observer car.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;