logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.06.27 2019누36188
의사면허취소처분 취소청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows: (a) at the bottom of 3 pages of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "standard 3 for mitigation" of 2 shall be deemed as "reduction Criteria"; (b) at 5 pages 8, the "patient" shall be deemed as "patient" or "patient"; and (c) at 6 pages

It is difficult to recognize that the evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone constituted a circumstance that constitutes the standard for mitigation of the instant case.

The reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the first instance, and this is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow