A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around December 1, 2009, the Defendant forged private documents at a limited liability company C office operated by the Defendant located in Seojin-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, and without authority, by using a computer, delegated the authority to A, with the use of the computer to “the delegation letter, and all of the works of the Dogjin Dam of the Korean Water Resources Corporation established by our contract. The E representative located in Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-gu, 2009.

f. Having drawn up a power of attorney “A” and marked a seal of “E Representative” prior to the above F name.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation in the name of E representative F, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. On the beginning of December 2009, the Defendant presented the victim G as if he were the power of delegation duly formed a forged power of delegation as described in paragraph (1) at the office of the above limited liability company C, and the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, as stated in this letter of delegation, he would allow B to divide the benefits of KRW 10 million into two parts, if he/she were to be delegated all of the works of the works of the works of the works of the works of the works of the works of the works of the works of the works of the works of the works of the works of the works of the North Korean Water Resources Corporation.

However, the fact is that the defendant did not have been delegated by E with the above timbering construction work, and E did not have the supply of the above timbering construction work.

As above, the Defendant exercised the forged power of attorney, deceiving the victim, and was transferred from the victim to the national bank account in the name of H as the contract amount on December 11, 2009.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each part of the prosecutor's office and police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A complaint;

1. Details of passbook transactions;

1. The application of delegation, letter, or statute;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Article 234 of the Criminal Act, and Article 234 of the Criminal Act for the crime;