logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.05.07 2012고단1349
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 17, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court and two years of suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on May 11, 2012.

The Defendant, from February 9, 2002 to May 2, 2009, is a person who had engaged in the repair and lease of construction machinery under the trade name “E” in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and has been in charge of all the above company’s accounting and administrative affairs.

1. Around June 2009, the Defendant: (a) knew that at the time of the operation of “E” and “E,” purchased the name of “E” in the name of “C” and “E; and (b) had the intent to forge the letter of delegation in the name of F in order to commission the law firm to commission the law firm with the preparation of a notarial deed of a monetary loan agreement with the content that the Dozer purchased the name of “E” to “C” and “E” and that he borrowed the money to F in order to receive money from the said F when he purchased the said Doz;

On November 27, 2009, the Defendant, a notary public on the 2nd floor of the New-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 4, 109-11 Law School Building, has, without authority, exercised the power of attorney in the letter of delegation of authentication in the form of letter of delegation of authentication kept at the office of the Nam-gu, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, the Defendant stated “A”, “Seoul-ro,” “Seoul-ro,” “Notarial Deed of a Monetary Loan Contract”, “F on November 27, 2009,” and “F” in the name column of the mandator’s name, forged one letter of attorney, which is a private document with respect to the rights and obligations under the name of the F and affixed a letter of attorney, which is a private document with respect to the rights and obligations under the name of the Republic of Korea, and exercised it as if the notary public who did not know the forgery was a power of attorney-at-law formed in a genuine manner.

2. The defendant has an attorney in charge of notarial deeds H who does not know that the power of attorney in the above F was forged at the same date and at the same place as the above paragraph (1).

arrow