1. The Plaintiff’s appeal and each incidental appeal against Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd and Defendant Spanco Construction Co., Ltd.

1. The reason why this Court's explanation concerning this part of the basic facts is as follows: "The result of the appraiser A's appraisal" of the first instance court No. 4 and 5 of the judgment of the first instance court is "the result of the appraiser A"; and "the result of the fact inquiry about the appraiser A of the first instance court" is the same as the part corresponding to the reason of the judgment of the first instance, except where "the result of the fact inquiry about the appraiser A of the first instance court of the first instance" is "the result of the fact inquiry about the appraiser A

2. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the judgment concerning the occurrence and scope of defects are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition or deletion of each corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Each "the result of appraiser A's appraisal" of not more than 10 pages 18 and 19 shall be each "the result of the appraiser A's appraisal" of the first instance court, and each "the result of the fact-finding to the appraiser A of this court" shall be each "the result of the fact-finding to the appraiser A of the first instance court".

Parts 11, Chapters 11 through 12, "no evidence exists for expert witness A or no evidence" shall be followed by the following parts:

According to the appraisal result of the appraiser A of the first instance trial, it can be acknowledged that the main and cafeteria floor of the apartment of this case was not constructed, respectively, with the interior materials mast of the apartment of this case, as the “tol-project floor,” and the wall body finishing materials as the “designated remote area, singing part: the body finishing part: the body finishing part: the body finishing part of the wall : the body finishing part of the apartment of this case.”

However, the above evidence can be acknowledged in full view of the results of the inquiry of the appraiser A by the court of first instance on September 1, 2013 and the purport of the entire pleadings, namely, the following circumstances, such as ① detailed drawings and specifications on the model of the apartment of this case, such as the design drawings and specifications of the apartment of this case.