1. Each of the plaintiffs' claims is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The grounds for the claim of this case are as shown in the annexed Form “the grounds for the claim” and “the preparatory documents”.

Plaintiff

The gist of the assertion is that ① the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Dong E with respect to the F 91 square meters in the name of the Sindong-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, and the purport of the claim is to seek cancellation of the registration of ownership transfer, as it is simply a title trust with respect to the F 91 square meters in the name of the Defendant. ② In addition, it is necessary to return the purchase fund received from the trust, which is the trust administrator, to the Defendant, as unjust enrichment, since the seller is a bona fide title trust with respect to the land of KRW 1,474 square meters in the name of Jung-gu, Young-gu, Jung-gu, Gangwon-do, and KRW 23,000 square meters in the name

(A) On February 2, 200, the Defendant denied the Plaintiff’s assertion that the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Defendant on real estate was based on a title trust agreement with the network E, and the Defendant’s assertion that the real estate or the purchase fund was donated from the network E.

The evidence evidence No. 1 through 9 alone is insufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion on the above title trust, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

[In full view of the whole purport of the pleadings by evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including paper numbers), the defendant holds a registration right of each of the above real estate, paid taxes and public charges, and paid gift tax due to donation. In full view of these facts, the defendant seems to have donated the above real estate or purchase fund from the deceased. Accordingly, the plaintiffs' claim is dismissed on the grounds that it is without merit.