logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.11.20 2014가합6612
사해행위취소
Text

1. The claims indicated in the separate sheet No. 1 attached hereto between the Defendant and the Rotterdam Co., Ltd. were concluded on June 17, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s claim for the price of goods is a person engaged in sales business, such as lux board, luxcco, pipes, etc. under the name of “B”. From August 201, the Plaintiff had a claim for the price of goods amounting to KRW 501,223,108,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

B. Around June 17, 2013, 201, 199, 199, 957, 265 won and the principal and interest of interest corresponding thereto (hereinafter “loan obligation of this case”) against the Defendant as to the transfer of claims (hereinafter “instant Claim Nos. 1, 2, and 3”) under the title of assignment (hereinafter “the instant Claim Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Claim Transfer Agreement”) were concluded against the Defendant. On the same day, the UN had concluded a contract on June 17, 2013 on the assignment of claims (hereinafter “the instant Claim Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Claim Transfer Agreement”), which is the debtor of the instant Claim No. 1, which is the debtor of the instant Claim No. 2, and the obligor of the instant Claim No. 3, which is the debtor of the instant Claim No. 3, and each of the aforementioned parties notified the obligor of the assignment of claims of this case (hereinafter “the aforementioned obligation”).

1. With respect to funds necessary for the production of DNA, if submitted and requested, the defendant shall actively examine and support the funds;

2. The transfer of claims may be concluded at the request of the Rotterdam when concluding a new order for installation and supply, in order to ensure the stable production of the Rotterdam.

3. At the same time as the assignment of claims in this case entered into with the third party obligor, the Tech is prohibited from transferring its rights to the goods supply contract entered into with the third party obligor.

arrow