1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 24,141,360 and the interest rate of KRW 20% per annum from May 30, 2013 to the day of complete payment.

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), it is recognized that the plaintiff supplied office supplies (the name of AMcar, etc.) to the defendant who sells office supplies in the trade name B between April 2010 and December 201, and that the defendant failed to pay KRW 24,141,360 out of the price of the above goods.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay 24,141,360 won and damages for delay to the plaintiff, except in extenuating circumstances.

2. As to the defendant's assertion, the plaintiff asserts that since the defendant did not pay the price of the goods that the defendant should pay to the plaintiff each month until the following month, or the accumulated price of the goods exceeds KRW 10,000,00, the supply of the goods was suspended, the defendant cannot be trusted the current status of the monthly claim (Evidence A 1) prepared by the plaintiff. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this,

3. Accordingly, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 24,141,360 of the goods price and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from May 30, 2013 to the date of full payment, as the Plaintiff seeks, pursuant to the Plaintiff’s claim, from May 30, 2013 to the date of full payment. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.