logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.11.06 2013고단3667
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaged in driving Category C vehicles.

On May 20, 2013, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license at around 14:25 on May 20, 2013, driving the said so-called “kickter” in front of the “kickter” in the solar reduction and exemption at the time of harmony, was made to turn to the left at the right right at the right right angle from the upstream.

Since there is no traffic signal, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely proceeding with a vehicle without a vehicle passing through the intersection by checking the front side and the left side of the driver.

Nevertheless, as seen above, the Defendant was negligent in making a left turn without a driver’s license, and the front part of the bus driving D(38 years old) in the two sides at the time of the left turn. The Defendant received the front part of the vehicle in front of the right side.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim F (n, 59 years of age) who is a passenger of the bus due to the above occupational negligence for about two weeks of medical treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) re-driving the above C Poter vehicle without obtaining a driver's license for about 4 km section from the front side of the road at the time of the same time from the front side to the front side of the said C Poter without obtaining a driver's license for the said C Poter vehicle at approximately 4 km section from the front side of the said C Poter.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, driving the said C Poter vehicle, which was not covered by the automobile mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mandatory insurance;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)7 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow