logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.08.25 2017고단1093
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 12, 2016, the Defendant issued 130,000 won in cash from a male male guest who was introduced by using smartphone hosting on September 12, 2016, around 21:30 on September 12, 2016, and provided sexual intercourse with the above male guest on July 21, 2016 through September 12, 2016, such as sexual intercourse with the above male guest, and provided sexual intercourse with the above male customer on September 26, 200.

"2017 Highest 1788"

1. On June 11, 2016, the Defendant, at around 15:20, engaged in sexual traffic by taking 1.30,000 won from the non-personal male who arranged in Furher 306 heading room in E, a commercial sex brokerage book G, and arranged as H, and engaging in sexual traffic by doing the said non-personal intercourse and a single sexual intercourse.

2. At around 17:13 on the same day, the Defendant 2.5 million won from other names in the same manner as the above 1st century, and engaged in sexual traffic by engaging in sexual intercourses with the above names in the same manner and twice.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 1093"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects by each prosecutor with regard to D;

1. Evidential photographs (Evidence Nos. 6) 2017 Highest 1788;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G or I;

1. Application of the statutes on the details of text conversations;

1. Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Sexual Traffic for the relevant criminal facts and for the selection of fines, Article 21 of the same Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant has the same record of suspending indictment, and that there are many frequency of sexual traffic, etc. are disadvantageous circumstances.

However, the defendant leads to confession and reflect against each of the crimes of this case as the first offender.

arrow