beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On November 30, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C’s residence located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, stating that “The Defendant would have a house in Changwon-si, Seoul to live in Seoul, which is planned to cut off the room into Changwon-si, with a deposit of KRW 5 million, and the Defendant would have a deposit of KRW 5 million.” The Defendant borrowed KRW 220,000,000 as well as KRW 150,000,000,000,000,000 won.”
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay even if he did not receive money from the injured party in the absence of any particular income at the time.
Nevertheless, the Defendant received 220,000 won in cash from the injured party.
2. On December 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph 1, at the victim on December 1, 2016, the Defendant borrowed KRW 600,000,000 from the Defendant’s “if there is a lack of internal room, and if the room is deducted in Seoul, it should be loaded and added, and the Defendant borrowed KRW 600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won
“A false statement” was made.
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay even if he did not receive money from the injured party in the absence of any particular income at the time.
Nevertheless, the Defendant received 600,000 won in cash from the injured party.
3. 피고인은 2016. 12. 2. 위 제 1 항 기재 장소에서 피해자에게 “ 붕어빵 장사를 하려고 기계를 샀는데 붕어빵 기계를 싣고 온 기사한테 운임 비를 줘야 된다 이 돈도 보증금을 빼서 오후 4시에 바로 주겠다.
“A false statement” was made.
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay even if he did not receive money from the injured party in the absence of any particular income at the time.
Nevertheless, the Defendant received 280,000 won from the damaged party via the NongHyup Bank account in the name of E.
Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and defrauds the victim a total of 1.1 million won over three times.
Summary of Evidence
1. The police of the defendant.