logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.08.31 2017고단1511
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle with D in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On April 7, 2017, the Defendant driven the foregoing vehicle while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.084% from blood transfusion around 21:58, and led to the flow of the intersection of the three-distance front of Gwangju city E in the direction of the luminous elementary school at a speed that cannot be known in the direction of the mix mountain path from the direction of the mix elementary school.

Since it is a three-distance intersection and at the time at night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by operating a motor vehicle driving service with a driver's duty of care by accurately manipulating the front side and the right and the right, and safely operating the steering system.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, and received the Victim F (48 Do) who was galle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle by negligence on duty, and was galle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the mouth of the pelvis, which was accompanied by a pelvis that requires treatment for about two months, due to the foregoing occupational negligence.

2. On April 7, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (breathing) driven a D body car with a alcohol content of about 0.084% from the 1km section from the front of the Defendant’s residence, around Gwangju City G and around 103 Do 301, to the E-loan-distance Intersection 301, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 0.084%.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act is the owner of the body automobile D.

No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, on April 7, 2017, the Defendant operated a motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance at approximately 1 km section from the front of the Defendant’s residence in Gwangju City G, 103 Do 301 to the third-distance intersection.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow