1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff of the disciplinary action in this case is a public official who was appointed as an assistant inspector on February 23, 2002 and worked in B by the Board of Audit and Inspection.

On December 30, 2014, the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 78(1)1 and 2 of the State Public Officials Act, following the resolution of the High Disciplinary Committee on December 30, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “the instant disciplinary cause”).

(hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”). 【Grounds for Disciplinary Action】

1. The Plaintiff, including the transfer of interest coupons, was unfairly involved in the matters of authorization and permission by himself/herself or a third party by taking advantage of the position of public officials of the Board of Audit and Inspection as follows.

The plaintiff related to the reinforcement military has been unjustly involved by forcing public officials of the reinforcement military to permit the fishing place business in which they invested.

B. The Plaintiff related to the Jung-gu Incheon Jung-gu exercised pressure to allow public officials of Jung-gu in Incheon to withdraw the order of removal of illegal buildings for the C fishing place.

C. The Plaintiff related to the Dotsan-gun exercised pressure to have Dotsan-gun officials withdraw the disposition of return of subsidies to the Dotsan-gun Sports Association.

2. Neglecting his/her service, such as leaving his/her workplace without permission;

A. On November 11, 2014, the Plaintiff left the business trip site to the head of the competent department, and visited the head of the Mosan-gun without any prior report.

B. On September 5, 2012, the Plaintiff related to the business trip of the Korea Rail Network Authority had not worked at the Korea Rail Network Authority, which was a business trip site without any prior contact, and had left the business trip site without permission by communicating D, which is the cause of the efforts to contact.

C. From July 5, 2011 to April 23, 2012, the Plaintiff used a swimming pool and a swimming pool for a total of eight working hours on a total of eight occasions. From June 12, 2012 to August 21, 2012, the Plaintiff used a swimming pool and a swimming pool for a total of fifteen working hours.

3. Illegal exemption from fines for negligence in breach of parking and stopping regulations in disguise of official duties.