Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. From March 1, 2014, the Plaintiff served as an assistant principal at B elementary school.
B. On December 10, 2015, the Gyeonggi-do General Disciplinary Committee for Public Educational Officials decided to punish the Plaintiff for three months of suspension from office pursuant to Article 78(1)2 and 3 of the State Public Officials Act on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Article 56 (Duty of Good Faith), Article 61 (Duty of Integrity), and Article 63 (1) 2 of the State Public Officials Act as grounds for the following disciplinary action (hereinafter “specific disciplinary action”) (hereinafter “the grounds for first disciplinary action”), and the Defendant was subject to the above resolution, against the Plaintiff for three months suspension from office on December 24, 2015.
1. On March 31, 2015, April 4, 2015, and April 9, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for overtime work falsely, and received a total of KRW 104,540 as an excess work allowance, but did not actually engage in excess work.
2. On August 11, 2014, the Plaintiff, without permission, went to work at a morning without processing the National Education Information System (NEI) service, and left the morning before leaving the morning.
3. During working hours, the Plaintiff drank alcohol at a lock stop while making a friendship club, etc. on April 30, 2014, May 15, 2014, and September 7, 2014. The Plaintiff drank alcohol at a lock stop during a racing-based experiential business trip, which was going from November 3, 2014 to November 5, 2014.
4. The Plaintiff violated the dignity maintenance, such as sexual assault, etc., committed sexual harassment against teachers and staff, on the ground that the Plaintiff made a speech to the teachers and staff member C of the school affairs administration affairs on the basis of why he or she would be why he or she would be why much.
5. From November 3, 2014 to November 5, 2014, the Plaintiff offered accommodation equivalent to 34,000 won by receiving a room from a company, which was offered from a company, to a hotel, a lodging company, a lodging company, a lodging company, a lodging company, a lodging company, a lodging company, a lodging company, a lodging business trip, “if the Drrings too much nose on the first day, leaving his knife his knife his knife his knife his knife on the first day.”
6. The budget; and