logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.10 2014고단1338
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. As of September 2, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) (hereinafter “Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection Act”) refers to a person who is a member of the Internet portal site, 2,594, as of September 2, 2013, and is entitled to membership only by the application without the approval or special permission of the car screen operator, and the member is a person who operates the car page B

Around August 23:31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) connected the Defendant’s house located in the Defendant’s house located in the building 405 Dong 1802 to the “D”; and (b) posted a false statement on the “B” bulletin board of the “Yaro,” stating, “I would like to pay money to E in advance; and (c) I would like to go against E if I would go through most of the B, from the above date to the 31st day of the same month, by openly revealing false facts through an information and communications network with a view to slandering people over a total of ten occasions, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 1.

2. Around October 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (information and communications network infringement, etc.) discovered the NAD “G” and its password, which the victim F was a member of the Internet search. On August 14, 2013, around 13:25, the Defendant arbitrarily accessed NAD and password from the Defendant’s house located at No. 405 Dong 1802, the building C, which had been a member of the Defendant’s office, without the F’s consent, and infringed on the information and communications network at least 66 times in total from the above date to September 3, 2013 without access authority as shown in attached Table 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the arrival of domestic animals;

1. A screen of the Internet site;

1. Report on internal investigation (On-site evidence and ID verification);

1. Printed materials;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on access data;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow