beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On April 2013, B, the representative director of the Plaintiff, filed a complaint with Nonparty C to the Seoul District Prosecutors’ Office on the charge of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud).
C As the director of the official business division of D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), when entering into a subcontract modification contract for the material engineering works among modern steel coding construction works entered into between A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “A”) and D, D shall not pay KRW 2,28,690,654 equivalent to the increased quantity of painting construction works, and shall cause D to obtain the same amount of damages as D in the same way as D, by allocating KRW 44,643 from the 60,363 cubic metres of the original subcontract price, excluding KRW 15,720,00,000,000,000 per pure painting construction cost, from the metres of the original subcontract price, to the cost of each item, such as various temporary construction cost, various inspection cost, and other cost, excluding KRW 15,720,00 per cubic metres.
B. On March 6, 2014, the prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office, who received the case of accusation, directed the investigation department to investigate the case (Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office 2013 type 35769 type 359 type 201 type 35769 type 3), made a decision not to prosecute the Defendant (hereinafter “instant non-prosecution disposition”), and received the notification of the reason not to prosecute on April 2, 2014 by requesting the Defendant to notify the Defendant of the reason not to prosecute.
C. On April 2, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application against the Defendant for a copying of the records of the non-prosecution case (No. 2013-type and No. 35769) with the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office (hereinafter “the records of the instant non-prosecution case”). However, the Defendant only granted a copy of the written complaint and the written statement submitted by B, and the remainder.