Each of the instant public prosecutions is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged and the victim E (the age of 44) are between the defendant and the defendant's office and the defendant's office living together with in-house relationship, and the victim F (the age of 16) is the parent of the victim E.

1. On June 2015, the Defendant of intimidation against the victim E: (a) tried to transmit the victim’s sexual intercourse message to the victim’s family members, with the content that “the victim would die; and (b) the victim would transmit the victim’s sexual intercourse image to the victim’s family members,” and that “the victim would transmit the victim’s sexual intercourse image to the victim’s family members.”

At around 00:44 on June 23, 2015, the Defendant sent the text message of the Kakao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kaoo Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Ka, which was named in the annexed crime list, to the victim’s home, and threatened the victim.

2. On June 25, 2015, at the Defendant’s house, around 13:37 on June 25, 2015, the Defendant threatened the victim by walking phone to the victim “in order to comply with the fact that the victim talked about the fact that the Defendant was the father of the former husband of E and the father of the victim, I, the father of the victim.”

2. Determination is the case falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. The victim E following the institution of the instant indictment. The victim F is each victim on August 12, 2015.