logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.16 2014고단4973
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On November 21, 2013, at around 06:30, the Defendant: (a) placed DNA 703, located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, into a single psychotropic-related injection machine; (b) recorded psychotropic drugs in a single circulatory circulp; and (c) injected them into the Defendant’s arms.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with D to administer philophones.

2. At around 07:00 on January 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had G in the room of the Felel located in E at the Government-si of Speaker, G in an insane room; and (b) had G inject the phiphone volume into the Defendant’s arms by the said method.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with G to administer philophones.

3. Around 04:00 on January 28, 2014, the Defendant had G in the same place, G in the same manner as above, to inject the volume of phiphones into the Defendant’s arms.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with G to administer philophones.

4. Around 04:00 on April 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had I in the heading room of the Mourel room where it is difficult to know the trade name H in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si; and (b) had I inject the volume of phiphone in the manner described above to the Defendant’s arms.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with I to administer philophones.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. A copy of the protocol of interrogation of the police officer G;

1. An appraisal statement - Application of A maternity legislation;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and Article 2 subparagraph 3 (b), and

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

3. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

4. The fact that the defendant's reasons for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. are both led to the confession of all crimes, there is no record of crimes, and there is any other reason.

arrow