1. Defendant B Co., Ltd.: 16,11,36 won to the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from June 13, 2014 to October 7, 2015.

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant B

A. As to the cause of the claim, Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) contracted landscaping construction work from Samro Co., Ltd. and subcontracted the Plaintiff among the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant construction work”). The construction cost of the construction work is set at KRW 5,30 per EA (150 x 150 x 150 x 1,000) and KRW 8,00 per 5,000 per EA, and the Plaintiff completed the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the 1,832EA, and completed construction of the construction of the 425 square meters additional to the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the 1,832E, or the construction work of the construction work of the 0000 won and the construction work price of the witness.

According to the above facts, barring any special circumstance, the defendant company is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 16,11,36 won [=43,791,200 won [=(5,048.9m25m2] x 8,000 m25m2] construction expenses for the construction of boundary stone] 9,764,560 won (1,832EA x 5,330 won) [42,80,000 won] and damages for delay.

Furthermore, the Plaintiff asserts that the Defendants had the burden of fine for negligence and heavy taxation 803,36 won due to the Defendants’ failure to pay the construction cost, and sought the payment thereof. However, there is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff had the burden of fine for negligence and heavy taxation, and there is no evidence to prove that this is related to the Defendant Company’s failure to pay the construction cost.

Therefore, the Defendant Company filed an application for modification of the purport of the instant claim with respect to KRW 16,11,36 with the Plaintiff, as sought by the Plaintiff.