beta
Text
1.Paragraph 1 and 2 of the order of the judgment of the first instance, including any claims added at the trial, shall be amended as follows:
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff around 2009 is the party's status 1) The plaintiff is the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L Apartment (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").
) The council of occupants' representatives (hereinafter referred to as the "council of occupants' representatives of this case").
(2) At the time, Defendant C was the representative of the Dong, 112 representative of the present council of occupants' representatives. At the time, Defendant C was the representative of the present council of occupants' representatives, and Defendant B was the representative of the 110 Dong representative of the present council of occupants' representatives. Defendant D, E, F, G, and H were the members of the “M organization” composed of the occupants of the present apartment complex. Meanwhile, the Selection is the Plaintiff’s husband, and the Selection and K are the Plaintiff’s children.
B. On or around July 31, 2009 and August 5, 2009, Defendant H prepared a written consent of dismissal against the Plaintiff with the purport that the Plaintiff illegally executed KRW 436,150,00 in total for the cost of providing meals and equipment to the U.S. workers cleaning the stairs among the management expenses incurred on May 2009 of the apartment of this case without the resolution of the instant council of occupants' representatives. The Plaintiff visited the occupants of this case and affixed a seal on the above written consent of dismissal from the occupants. However, even at the time of cleaning the apartment stairs of this case, the Plaintiff received the above written consent of removal from the council of occupants' representatives on or around May 31, 2009, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s removal from the above written consent of the council of occupants’ representatives was made to the U.S. members each time of cleaning the apartment stairs of this case. However, even at the time of cleaning the apartment stairs of this case, the Plaintiff received the above written consent of removal from the council of occupants’ representatives.
The defendant B, C, etc. additionally affix their seals to the written consent for dismissal from 10 residents.