1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the party concerned ) Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

2) The apartment building of this case consists of 26 units, 1,372 units. The representative of the apartment building of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “Dong representative”).

2) The council of occupants’ representatives of D apartment units consisting of 26 autonomous management organizations (hereinafter “council of occupants’ representatives”).

The term of office of the second representative of the Dong was from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010. However, around 2009, the Plaintiff, as the second representative of the Dong unit of the apartment complex of this case, performed the general secretary-general of the council of occupants' representatives, and Defendant C performed the second representative of the apartment complex of this case. Defendant C was working at the E police station having jurisdiction over the apartment complex of this case as a police officer around 2012.

B. Procedures for the dismissal of the representative of the Plaintiff and related disputes 1, F, and G, which were the same representative of the instant apartment building and the auditor of the council of occupants' representatives, on the bulletin board of the instant apartment on August 4, 2009; and

1. The head of the Center, the plaintiff, and the chairperson illegally executed the amount of KRW 436,150 under the pretext of non-permanent food expenses when cleaning the stairs among the management expenses in May 2009, without the resolution of the council of occupants' representatives, and the audit and inspection thereof;

5. Despite the existence of operating expenses of the council of occupants' representatives among the management expenses in June 2009, the provisional representative council prepared and posted a “resident consent form” containing the contents of the head of the center, the plaintiff, and the Chairperson’s auditor who has appropriated 103,080 won as miscellaneous expenses for the second time.

However, at each time of cleaning apartment stairs of this case, the plaintiff, according to customary practice, provided the US Won with 328,650 won in total in the market price, after obtaining approval from the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives, and provided the above agenda items to the council of occupants' representatives on June 26, 2009.