1. The Defendant’s KRW 300,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from October 14, 2014 to January 25, 2017.

1. Basic facts

A. The same year on the grounds that the Plaintiff was detained on suspicion of fraud, etc., including the Plaintiff’s detention and confirmation of judgment, and was detained in Busan Detention Center on February 6, 2009 and the intensive treatment of liver cell cancer, etc. is necessary.

5.1. The release was made upon the decision to suspend detention and received a simple operation at Samsung Seoul Hospital on May 28, 2010.

2) On December 13, 2011, the Plaintiff was sentenced by the Busan District Court to the effect that “the Plaintiff shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc.” and around that time, the decision to suspend detention was revoked and the decision to suspend detention was re- admitted to the Busan Detention Center, but the Plaintiff was released upon the decision to suspend detention on February 21, 201, on the ground of yellow calendars following the rejection response after simple surgery. 3) The Plaintiff appealed against the above judgment and appealed the imprisonment with prison labor for a period of two years on February 8, 2013, but the appeal was dismissed on April 17, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive.

B. Around November 26, 2013, the Plaintiff, including the execution of a sentence against the Plaintiff, was confined to the Seongdong-gu Prison and transferred to the Daegu Prison. On March 20, 2014, the Plaintiff was released on the same day after receiving a decision to suspend the execution of punishment on the grounds of inter-borderation, etc., and on May 16, 2014, the said decision to suspend the execution of punishment was revoked, and was transferred to the Busan Prison on July 30, 2014.

(F) On October 8, 2015, the term of punishment expires). . [Grounds for recognition] without any dispute; Gap evidence 2 through 4; Eul evidence 1 through 3, 5 through 7, 9, 10; Eul evidence 13, 14-1 through 4; Eul evidence 15-1, 2; Eul evidence 16-1 through 5; Eul evidence 17-1, 2; Eul evidence 17-2; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion related to the Busan detention center is an ordinary ward without proper treatment, such as taking the type B liver drugs, even though the blood examination conducted around February 6, 2009 was found to have a problem with the Plaintiff at the time of confinement in the Busan detention center.