1. On November 11, 2014, the Defendant’s portion of the Defendant’s disposition against the Plaintiff as non-competent to the person rendering distinguished services to the State, is cut off, sl.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 5, 1982, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on May 15, 1982, and was discharged from military service on February 28, 2014.

B. On March 3, 2014, the Plaintiff’s military service rendered to the Defendant on March 3, 2014 (i) through (ii) infant, (iii), (iv), Manee, knee, knee, (vii), liver cell cancer, and (viii) 'mary stress disorder or less' through (viii).

The applicant filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State.

C. On November 11, 2014, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition on the grounds that: (a) it is difficult to recognize that the Plaintiff was wounded in performing duties or education and training directly related to the national defense, security, etc.; and (b) it cannot be recognized that other duties or education and training are caused by the occurrence or aggravation of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation; and (c) it does not meet all the requirements for

[The facts that there is no dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 33 to 35, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that he was appointed as a staff member on May 15, 1982, and had been continuously trained while working as a staff member from March 2, 2005, and had received training for treating the body continuously, and the plaintiff suffered from ① or vi) in the process.

In addition, since October 2005, since the bypassive work was newly performed, the inter-cell cancer (No. 2005) and the ex post facto stress disorder occurred due to severe mental stress.

(1) The plaintiff is a wounded person who has rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran's compensation in the course of performing his duty or education and training directly related to national security.

B. (1) On April 1982, 1982, the Plaintiff fells on the right side of 1, 2, 2, 1985, and 1.