logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.07.02 2015고합53
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 21, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc.) asked the Defendant from among the Does, who was driven by the victim C (the age of 61) to the beneficial apartment in the Don-dong in Jeju Island, before the Don-si Don-si Don-dong Don-si Don-si Don-si Don-dong on April 21, 2015, that the Defendant she was under the influence of the Defendant, who was under the influence of the Defendant, after he was informed of the victim’s her her her hand from the back seat of the taxi and then asked her her her face on one occasion after she was she was heeped, and was

The Defendant, while driving away from a fright-free taxi, caused the victim's face once a week by drinking fright-free by the victim, was injured by the victim, such as the injury of the fright-free alcohol and the damage of the fright-free river that requires treatment for about two weeks.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation and caused the injury.

2. On April 21, 2015, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender from a police officer dispatched after receiving a report from the above C on the grounds of the preceding paragraph on April 21, 2015, and was arrested as a flagrant offender on the same day at the cell of the Jeju Police Station located in the Dongdong-gu, Jeju at around 02:20 on the same day.

After entering the Defendant, it was difficult for the police officer to have avoided a disturbance by, for about two hours, such as “if there is any reason to do so, we will see all the police officers.”

On the same day, at around 04:23, the police officer, who belongs to the above police station, moved the defendant to a protective detention room in the detention room and tried to file a petition, he opened the right buck part of the defective E, and assaulted the body of E, such as walking the body of E several times due to the outbreak.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of detained police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement in C and E;

1. Each investigation report and accompanying materials;

1. Photographs of the victim;

1.Each.

arrow