A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 1, 2018, around 03:53, the Defendant violated the Framework Act on Fire Services and the Defendant injured the victim E (the victim E (the age of 27) who was a fire fighter belonging to the Jeju fire fighting unit D 119 center that received the 119 report and dispatched to the site on the front side of the “C” located in Jeju-si, Jeju-si on August 1, 2018, confirmed the Defendant’s condition that he was staying in the stairs of the building, and confirmed the Defendant’s condition that he was diving and was diving, and confirmed that he was “Isked, I will come back. I will come back with the victim’s left part.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with life-saving and emergency medical services of the victim who is a fire-fighter, and at the same time inflicted injury on the victim, such as the impairment of saves that require medical treatment for about two weeks.

2. On August 1, 2018, the Defendant was arrested in the act of committing the crime under the preceding paragraph, and was admitted to the Jeju East Police Station’s metropolitan detention room 5 around 05:20.

As above, the Defendant continued to take a bath even after being admitted to the detention room, and carried out a disturbance by opening the bar door of the detention room with his hand and head, and the Defendant said that he would be able to use money and telephone conversations to G during the investigation of the Jeju East Police Station and the investigation of the Jeju Police Station where he was on duty as the custody custody officer, and to make telephone conversations with G during the work of the F.

On the same day, G accepted the demand of the defendant at around 06:05, and had him talk with telephone conversations in the physical examination room in the detention room, but the defendant continued to scam while taking a bath, and the defendant was unable to avoid disturbance, and as G was prevented from committing the defendant's act, the defendant was faced with G.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer G's legitimate execution of duties within the detention room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Each statement of H and G;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 50 subparagraph 1 (c) and Article 16 (2) of the Framework Act on Fire Services for a crime and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act.