A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 8, 2019, at around 03:35, the Defendant expressed his desire to “C” on the front of the 112 report that “A” located in Ansan-si, Masan-si B, and that “the foregoing person shall interfere with his business,” to the slope E and policeman F of the Ansan-gu Police Station D Boxes affiliated with the Ansan-si Police Station, which called “N”, “Ns are blished, and the police are flick,” and assaulted the Defendant at one time as to the right side of the F’s face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements to F, E, and G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The fact that there is a record of being punished twice as a crime of violence for the reason of sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act in the suspension of execution: Provided, That there is no record of punishment exceeding a fine and there is no record of criminal punishment after 2012, and other circumstances, such as the degree of interference with violence and official duties, recognition of a mistake, and reflects it;