A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On June 11, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 as a crime of violating Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Southern District Court.

[Criminal Facts]

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is engaged in driving of the CF car at the BNA.

On June 11, 2020, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.182% in blood around 01:05, and the Defendant was proceeding in the direction of eronom in the direction of eronom in the direction of transmission from the erogate of 163 Maero, as Seoul airport, to the intersection of 163 in the direction of transmission.

At this time, there was a night, and there was a signal apparatus, so in such cases, a person engaged in driving service is prohibited from driving under drinking, and there was a duty of care to observe signals and to prevent accidents by operating the steering and brakes properly.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left, and received the front part of the driver’s seat of the victim C(49 years old) who was at the right turn to the left in accordance with the new code from the scopic scopic scopic scopic scopty from the scopic scopic scopic scopic scops.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the “infection fluor’s salt and tension,” which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) on the road from the front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the intersection of about 1.9k alcohol concentration at approximately 0.182% under the influence of alcohol at the section of about 1.9km from the front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City to the front of the same airport as the former airport at around the day of paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving regulations not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Results of the video verification by this court;

1. A traffic accident report, a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, and a statement on the circumstances of the driver with the main driver;