logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.06.13 2016고단1118
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 22, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with 0.057% alcohol concentration in blood on the five-lane section from the front side of the Puart loan fryp, which is located in the east-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, to the front side of the small shooting distance in the 33-lane, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a car at BV.

On January 22, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol as set forth in paragraph (1) of the No. 23:30 on January 22, 2016, and driven the said car at an insular speed at the right angle, one lane from the side of the right edge of the small shooting distance in front of the 33-lane of the Seocheon-si, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely according to traffic signals to those engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the left left turn from the back of the calendar station to the left turn at the left turn, and the front part of the victim C (57 Dop si's driving)'s driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim I (26) who was on board the fourth city car due to the foregoing occupational negligence, such as the need to provide approximately two weeks medical treatment, and the victim who was on board the same car.

arrow