beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On June 2, 1970, on each of the lands listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the lands of this case”) as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the lands of this case”), the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of 1/3 shares in each of the following three shares on July 8, 1970: the network S (Plaintiff’s father), the network H (Defendant C, Defendant D, E’s husband, and Defendant B, respectively.
B. After that, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on December 7, 1983 with respect to the net S 1/3 shares in each of the instant lands on July 1, 1982 on the ground of inheritance due to the consultation and division as of July 1, 1982.
C. Meanwhile, with respect to the shares of the network H H 1/3 among each land of this case, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on August 7, 1993 by the Plaintiff and I (Defendant B’s children), and on February 1, 2005, on the following grounds: (a) the registration of ownership transfer was revoked on November 21, 1998 on the ground of the following: (b) the registration of ownership transfer was completed on August 21, 1998; and (c) the registration of ownership transfer was completed on February 1, 2005 on the ground that the sale was made on January 21, 2005.
After all, the registration of transfer of ownership was completed on the same day on April 2, 2012 with respect to the shares of T 1/3 in the land listed in the attached list No. 4, and on the shares of Defendant B B 2/3 on November 25, 2013 on November 28, 2013 with respect to the shares of T 1/3 in the land listed in the attached list No. 4, respectively.
E. Meanwhile, the deceased on December 2, 201, and the deceased on December 2, 201, and Defendant C, D, and E jointly succeeded to the networkF’s property.
[Reasons for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1-4, Gap evidence 5, and 10-1, 2, 3, Gap evidence 23, 24, Eul evidence 21, and 22, each of the evidences of Nos. 1-5, Gap evidence 1-5, and 10-5, and the purport of the whole pleadings as a result of the fact inquiry of each of the evidences of fact to the labor union of the
2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiff.