logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.07.12 2018고단2309
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On May 16, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for injury, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on June 2018 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 24th day

【Criminal Facts】

1. Interference with business;

A. On December 20, 2017, at around 20:20, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main shop business by force, such as undermining the victim’s main shop business by force, such as undermining the drinking line and alcohol remaining on the table, which was operated by the victim C (n, 56 years of age) in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, by hand, under the influence of the victim’s “Dran bar” operated by the victim C (n, and 56 years of age), and undermining the victim’s main shop business.

B. On January 14, 2018, at around 20:50, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main store business by force, such as “G” operated by the victim F (59 years of age) of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, under the influence of “G”, and an employee whose name was unknown at that point is about to bring alcohol into the victim’s main store business.

2. Damage to property;

A. The defendant 1-B

The phrase "(a)" in the indictment is obvious that it is a clerical error (F 102, 103 pages of the police statement of the F), so it shall be corrected as above.

The above victim's market price owned by the above victim was damaged by drinking 90,000 won at the same time and at the same place of alcohol.

B. On February 26, 2018, the Defendant, at around 20:30, damaged the Defendant’s market price by 100,000 won of the entrance door door door door door door door door door door door door, which was operated by the “J” operated by the victim I (the age of 68) of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, by the Defendant. The Defendant was able to bread with the customer under the influence of alcohol and the horse fighting with the victim, who was ever under the influence of alcohol, and the victim was able to said bread, let the Defendant open the door door, and d

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to C, F, and I;

1. Relevant photographs and field photographs;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow