Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant: (a) knew that it is easy for the Defendant Company D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “D”) to generate malodor in the process of the entry into force of compost and, if so, is vulnerable to the occurrence of wastewater; and (b) used it to gather money and valuables from the said Company, with the knowledge that it is difficult for the Defendant to generate malodor in the process of the entry into force of compost, saw, rice, rice, etc.; and (c) used it to gather money and valuables from the said Company as an executive officer of an environmental organization;
1. On March 1, 2006, the head of the company and the head of the company and the F (the 43 years of age) who was in possession of the victim F (the victim) was found to be the victim D (the head of the company) in the U.S. E located in the U.S. in the U.S. P.M. on the second half of the 2006 day. "If there are many malodors in the company, and there are many rains in the company, wastewater is found. There is a lot of wastewater in the company. There is a fact that there is a lot of fines for negligence of several million won by filing a complaint with the supervisor of the environmental organization, and if the complaint is filed with the government office, it will be a lot of fines for negligence and interfere with the operation of the factory." At the same time, it would be possible to file a complaint with the government office, and the total market price of the victim's D (the owner) owned at the same place is about 180,000 g of agriculture and about 20 20 g of the market price.
2. Around 10:00 on June 2012, 2012, a phone call was made in advance to the victim D, and the search was made in the same manner as the statement in paragraph 1, and the Defendant demanded cash of KRW 200,000 in cash for meeting expenses of an environmental organization to which the Defendant belongs and subsequently withdrawn from the call. However, the Defendant did not comply with the above company’s failure to respond to such attempt.
Summary of Evidence
1..