logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.03.16 2016고정1726
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On April 20, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for the attempted crime of intrusion on a night structure at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 7, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On January 2016, the Defendant stolen the victim’s driver’s license license in the victim’s name within the victim’s wall between one eye and one eye. In the victim’s house, the victim’s automobile driving license in the victim’s name was cut off.

2. The Defendant, at around January 29, 2016, opened a passbook at the point of Nam-gu, Seoul, Nam-gu, 455, Nam-gu, Seoul, Nam-gu, Seoul, and presented C’s driver’s license under custody due to theft as described in paragraph 1, which was requested by Nonghyup employee D to present his/her identification card.

Accordingly, the defendant used official document unlawfully.

3. The Defendant entered the name “C”, resident registration number “E”, address “F and 101 South-gu”, and mobile phone “G” in the application for transaction of self-reliance deposits at the time, place, and place indicated in paragraph (2).

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of application for self-reliance deposit transaction in the name of private document C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

4. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 2, exercised a copy of the application for the transaction of a self-reliance deposit, as if it were duly formed, to NA employees who knew of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A copy of an application for transaction, and a copy of an inquiry about authenticity;

1. On-site reports;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes of the report of investigation;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 329 of the choice of punishment (abstinence of intention), Article 230 of the Criminal Act (abstinence of official document), Article 231 of the Criminal Act (abstinence of private document) and Article 234 of the Criminal Act.

arrow