The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. On June 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 16:32 on June 25, 2016, on the part of the Defendant: (b) was faced with knee in the victim’s right knee, while she was going to know in front of the vehicle in order to have a dispute with the victim due to the Defendant’s movement of the Defendant’s small-scale car parked in front of the E-cafeteria operated by the Defendant in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu; and (c) he was faced with the victim’s right kne, while driving the knee in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in which the victim was going to move the knee.

“The victim’s arms face with the driver’s seat of the said small-scale vehicle at a rapid speed, and thereby, the victim’s arms exceeded the floor, and the victim suffered injury, such as a diversified liver, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the Defendant’s assertion recognizes the fact that the Defendant had no intention to inflict an injury on the victim by negligence on the vehicle, which is a dangerous thing to the Defendant, but the prosecutor expressed his/her intent not to modify the indictment (the crime of injury caused by negligence under Article 266 of the Criminal Act cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent, and the victim of this case expressed his/her intention not to prosecute prior to the prosecution). B. The facts charged in the instant case are premised on the premise that “the fact charged in the instant case is based on the premise that “the Defendant was aware that the damaged person was in a state where he/she was sold on the window frame of the driver’s seat of the sofa vehicle, so that the victim’s arms would go beyond the floor of the driver’s seat while he/she was faced with the driver’s seat,” and accordingly, evidence corresponding thereto has the victim D’s statement and witness F’s statement.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, the above evidence alone is sufficient to have no reasonable doubt that the defendant had such intention.