logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2020.07.24 2020고단822
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives B-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-C.

On February 16, 2020, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 10:16, and left the listed intersection of 18, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoul.

Since there is a long distance intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as reducing the speed prior to entering the intersection and driving safely in accordance with the signals by checking well the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to enter the above intersection by negligence, and directly leading up to the right side from the left side of the course to the right side of the victim E (hereinafter referred to as 26 years old) driving with the front side of the FEE car driven by the victim G (V, South and fifty-five years old) who was signaled on the opposite side due to the shock, was shocking the front side of the HE car driven by the victim G (V, South and fifty-five years old) who was signaled on the opposite side, and was the victim J-owned building in the same Gu I located on the left side of the course direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc. in light of the trend that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and inflicted injury on the victim K (hereinafter 51 years old), such as salt, tensions, etc. in light of the trend that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, damaged the victim E to KRW 8,970,718 of the repair cost for the above EXE, and damaged the victim G to KRW 1,728,615 of the repair cost for the above EXE, and KRW 59,580,000 of the repair cost for the above building and the machinery installed inside the above building, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of each victim of E and G;

1. Each written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. The actual condition survey report;

arrow