logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.12 2013가단5129174
손해배상 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) From April 2, 2010 to August 31, 2011, the Defendant: (a) paid KRW 16,950,000 to 00 as stated in the attached crime list, such as embezzlement of KRW 00,00,00,00 to 30,000,000,000,000 won as KRW 0,000,00,000,000,000,000,000 won was paid to the Plaintiff’s head of the branch; (b) from September 1, 2011 to March 26, 201; and (c) from September 20, 201 to March 26, 2012; (d) the Plaintiff’s insurance solicitor paid KRW 10,000,000,000 to 0,000,000,000 won paid to the Plaintiff’s head of the branch of the branch;

In addition, even though the Defendant entered J as an insurance solicitor, as if the insurance solicitor F of the branch run by the Defendant entered J, the attracting car code was entered into “F” and the Plaintiff paid KRW 6,000,000 in total to F on February 1, 2011, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 2,000,000 on March 4, 201, and KRW 2,000,000 on May 6, 2011.

B. Determination 1 on the claim for damages due to occupational embezzlement.

arrow