Defendant

A and C shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by imprisonment for ten months, and by imprisonment for four months, respectively.

(b).

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are insurance solicitors working at the G branches of the Victim F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “victim Company”) located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Busan, the insurance agency, and H are those who have overall control over the management of insurance solicitors and the conclusion and management of insurance contracts while serving as the G branches.

H introduces the fact that when concluding an insurance contract recruited at the above branch, nominal money such as commission and award money is paid to H, and commission and award money is also paid to the Defendants who are insurance solicitors, the Defendants introduced a so-called “one-called “self-electronic program” to the victim company if the insurance design is made in such a way that they would have concluded an insurance contract mainly in the name of a person who has no intent to continue to maintain it, and pay the premium for a certain period of time, and would have the insurance contract invalidated while paying the premium for a certain period, and would receive the fee and award money from the victim company. The Defendants attempted to obtain money from the victim company under the pretext of commission and award money by concluding a false insurance contract in accordance with the said “self-electronic program”.

1. On April 2018, Defendant A claimed insurance solicitor recruitment fees to employees in charge of the victim company at the above point, Defendant A submitted an insurance subscription form as if he/she were willing to recruit normal members through genuine insurance subscription and claimed fees.

However, in fact, the policyholder of the insurance subscription submitted by the defendant was a false policyholder who has no intention to maintain the insurance contract while paying the actual insurance premium normally, and the defendant was thought to have the insurance contract invalidated while paying the insurance premium in the short term only under his name.

As above, the Defendant deceivings employees in charge of the victim company, and is therefore subject to fees from the victim company around April 27, 2018.