Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The head of the management office of multi-family housing with at least 150 households where elevators are installed shall obtain qualifications as housing managers or assistant housing managers.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without acquiring qualifications as housing managers, etc., served as the head of the management office of the D Apartment 156 household, which is a multi-family housing with an elevator located in the Seocho-si, from June 8, 2012 to July 24, 2013, and performed duties such as operation and management of multi-family housing.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation intelligence report and case sending;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 98 subparagraph 9 and 56 of the Housing Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. D apartment as indicated in the facts of the facts of the argument in the judgment of the purport of the claim is a leased apartment, and only under Article 55 of the former Housing Act (amended by Act No. 7757, Dec. 23, 2005; Act No. 7757, Feb. 24, 2006), the obligation to assign a housing manager or assistant housing manager to the head of the management office. The above provision applies to the first placement of the head of the management office after the enforcement of the said Housing Act, and the person who worked as the head of the management office from the existing head of the management office is not subject to the above provision. The defendant worked as the head of the management office of the said D apartment from 202 prior to the enforcement of the said Housing Act. Thus, the defendant cannot be subject to the said Housing Act.

2. According to each evidence submitted by the Defendant, even though the Defendant had worked as the head of the management office of the above D apartment from around 2002, the above D apartment is deemed to have worked as the head of the management office of the above D apartment, and even if so, the above D apartment is amended by Act No. 7757 of Dec. 23, 2005.