Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the field agent of the management entity of D Apartment, which is a multi-family housing subject to the compulsory management of D Apartment in the mountain, the mountain, the mountain, and the mountain, and the defendant A is the person in charge of the management of D Apartment.

A housing manager, etc. without obtaining qualifications shall not perform the duties of the head of the management office of a multi-family housing, and shall not allow a person who is disqualified to perform such duties.

Defendant

B around July 1, 2016, Defendant A, who is not a housing manager, had Defendant A perform the duties of the head of the management office, such as operation, management, maintenance, repair, collection and management of management expenses, defect repair, etc. of D apartment units subject to compulsory management at the location of the mountain, the mountain, the mountain, the mountain and the forest, and the forest, and Defendant A performed the said duties from that time until January 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants and G

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as appended documents, such as a list of consenters, a copy of identification number, and a statement of management expenses and withdrawal;

1. Article 99 subparagraph 5 of the Multi-Family Housing Management Act, Article 67 of the same Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the provisional payment order

1. The summary of the assertion was not that Defendant A entered into a management consignment agreement with Defendant B, and the sales of the housing was low at the time, and there was no head of the management office’s duty.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, Defendant A prepared or issued various documents, such as a management advertising contract for convenience facilities, a management service contract for multi-family housing consignment management, a tax invoice, a business registration certificate, etc., as a representative of the head of the management office, in the absence of a person to perform the duties of the head of the management office.