1. The defendant net E’s taking over of the lawsuit amounting to KRW 29,318,877, and KRW 1,285,714, and Plaintiff D, respectively, 857.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) Network E (hereinafter “the deceased”).

J (hereinafter referred to as the “instant store”) in Y (hereinafter referred to as the “instant store”) in Y, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Y.

The deceased is a person operating the instant lawsuit. On June 2, 2015, during the instant lawsuit, the deceased died, and his heir, who was the wife, the Defendant’s attorney-at-law (hereinafter “Defendant”).

(2) On May 1, 201, Plaintiff A was temporarily engaged in the delivery of the instant store on May 1, 201, and Plaintiff B and C were the parents of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D were the students of Plaintiff A.

Plaintiff

A, even when he was 16 years of age at the time, the Defendant G, who worked at the instant store, said that he was “18 years of age and has a driver’s license,” and the Deceased was in charge of delivery duties to the Plaintiff G without verifying the trust and the driver’s license.

3) On May 1, 201, Plaintiff A, without a motorcycle driver’s license, shall be deemed to have been registered 50:00 cubic centimeters (hereinafter “the instant Austria”) without a motorcycle driver’s license in order to deliver the chills around 20:25.

ii)A Lexton car driven by K driving in the direction of the running direction of the Orato in the direction of the right side from the left side of the Oratop in the direction of the direction of the passage of the Oratop in the direction of the right side, while driving a two-lane of the two-lanes of the roads in the direction of the direction of the passage of the Oratop in the middle Espton apartment site in the direction of the Cheongan-dong National Pension Service in the Cheongan-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do. (hereinafter referred to as the “instant vehicle”).

(B)In conflict with each other, and as a result, suffering from injury, such as cerebral cerebral typhy, cerebral typhism, and cerebral typhism, which require treatment for about five months (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”).

4) The Plaintiff A and K, a driver of the instant vehicle, asserted that they violated the signal of each other, but as a result of the investigation, they could not lead to the subject of the signal violation.

On July 11, 2012, Plaintiff A committed a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act due to the damage of the instant vehicle. The Defendants are the Plaintiff’s signal.