logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.07.02 2015고단524
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 524] Defendant A’s fraud means, in March 2014, the victim E, who is a construction business operator, at the office at the construction site office of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, that “I will pay the full amount of construction cost at the time of completion of the construction work” to the victim E, who is a construction business operator.

However, in fact, the Defendant, as a person with bad credit standing at the time, did not have any particular asset, and there was a need for a loan from a financial institution in order to pay the construction cost, but in the first financial right, the first financial right was refused to grant the loan, and there was little possibility of the loan through the loan hub so that the payment of the construction cost could not be made.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, had the victim complete the above construction work until April 20, 2014, thereby acquiring profits equivalent to KRW 28,250,000 for construction cost.

[2015 Highest 708] Joint criminal conduct by the Defendants and Defendant A’s sole criminal conduct are the Chairperson of F Co., Ltd., the President of F Co., Ltd., the President of F Co., Ltd., and Defendant B’s former duties of F Co., Ltd.

Defendants and G were in a state of failure to properly pay the land purchase and sale contract amount to the landowner J with respect to the construction work of H and 5 lots of land outside Kim Jong-si, and were in a state of lack of economic ability, and the possibility of lending the said land as collateral was unclear. As such, even if borrowing KRW 30 million from the victim K from the victim K, they did not have the intent or ability to repay the loan, and the victim did not have any intent or ability to pay the construction cost even if the said I construction work was conducted

1. Defendants B and G’s co-principals on January 2014 at the Doro department stores and coffee stores located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendants and G around February 13, 2014 to the victims in the F Office of the 3rd floor Co., Ltd. of Lbuilding in the two cities around February 13, 2014.

arrow