beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for one year, and Defendant C’s imprisonment for a fine of three thousand won, respectively.
Defendant .
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
G, around November 2010, Defendant B requested Defendant A and Defendant C to report false lien on the above R land in order to eliminate other bidders in the Incheon District Court’s auction case of M, N, and O forest owned by H, and in Incheon District Court’s auction case of M, N, and M, O forest owned by G and receive a successful bid at a lower price. The above Q land requested Defendant A to report false lien on the above R forest.
1. On November 16, 2010, Defendants B, B, B, and G co-principal Defendants and G were in the Incheon District Court located in Nam-dong, Incheon Metropolitan City, with respect to their L Auction Cases, and even though there was no civil construction work in an amount equivalent to KRW 230 million on the site of the above I, J, and K, Defendant S Co., Ltd. operated by Defendant A, without having performed the civil construction work in an amount of KRW 230 million on the site of the above I, J, and C, with the claim for the construction cost of KRW 230 million on the above land, the said S occupied the above land and submitted a false contract agreement and a false lien report as if he/she exercised the lien.
As a result, Defendants and G have harmed the fairness of auction by means of fraudulent means.
2. On November 30, 2010, Defendants B, C, and G co-principal Defendants and G were in the Incheon District Court located in the Nam-dong, Incheon Metropolitan City in relation to the P auction case, and the facts in relation to the P auction case of the relevant court were not having performed civil engineering works equivalent to KRW 275 million in Incheon-gun M, N, and O forests and fields, and even though they did not possess possession of the land, they did not have any civil construction works in an amount of KRW 275 million in the above land and filed a false contract and a lien report as if they occupied the above land and exercised a lien.
As a result, Defendants and G have harmed the fairness of auction by means of fraudulent means.
3. Defendants B, A, and G co-principal defendants and G are co-principal defendants and G on 2010.