The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on October 2, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 29, 2013.

On August 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) discharged the Defendant at the emergency room of the Yangsan Busan District Hospital located in Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si, on the ground that the Defendant did not re-hospitalize the Defendant, and (b) discharged the Defendant at the above hospital; (c) left one computer monitor for the patient, which was 1 meter long as 1 meter long as she was placed in his/her hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant has impaired the utility of a computer monitoring unit to be equivalent to 235,000 won of repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Investigation reports (verification of prices of damaged goods);

1. Previous records: Criminal records and application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act exempted from punishment (the crime of this case was committed before and after the judgment, and it was possible to have the case tried at the same time, taking into account various circumstances, such as the degree of the crime of this case and the Defendant’s health condition);